Cosmos Week
JWST discovers that Chariklo's invisible rings are changing
Earth scienceEnglish editionScience journalismJournalistic coverage

JWST discovers that Chariklo's invisible rings are changing

Until just over a decade ago, ring systems were thought to be exclusive to the giant planets of the solar system, such as Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune.

Original source cited and editorially framed by Cosmos Week. Phys. org Space
Editorial signatureCosmos Week Editorial Desk
Published09 Sep 2026 18: 00 UTC
Updated2026-09-09
Coverage typeScience journalism
Evidence levelJournalistic coverage
Read time4 min read

Key points

  • Focus: Until just over a decade ago, ring systems were thought to be exclusive to the giant planets of the solar system, such as Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and
  • Detail: Science reporting: verify primary technical documentation
  • Editorial reading: science reporting; whenever possible, verify the cited primary source.
Full story

Until just over a decade ago, ring systems were thought to be exclusive to the giant planets of the solar system, such as Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. The science-journalism coverage adds useful context, while the strongest evidential footing still comes from the underlying data, papers or institutional documentation.

The significance lies in Earth science becomes stronger when local observations can be placed inside a broader physical pattern that spans time and geography. The planet operates as a coupled system in which atmospheric, oceanic, cryospheric and solid-Earth processes interact across timescales from days to millions of years. A measurement that captures one variable at one location and one moment has limited interpretive value until it is embedded in the longer series and wider spatial coverage that allow natural variability to be separated from forced change. This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. However, in 2013, a small body barely 250 kilometers (155 miles) in diameter, located at nearly 17 times the Earth, sun distance, joined this small group.

18, 2022, the Institute of Astrophysics of Andalusia (IAA-CSIC) led an observation with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) to study Chariklo's rings through a stellar. Now, a new study published in Science Advances and also led by the IAA-CSIC demonstrates, for the first time, that Chariklo's ring system has undergone changes on timescales of.

By comparing JWST observations with those obtained during other stellar occultations over the last decade, we discovered opposite changes in the two rings: While the inner ring. The study also represents a significant technological advance: The occultation by Chariklo was the first stellar occultation specifically predicted and planned for observation.

Achieving this required knowing with extraordinary precision the orbit of Chariklo, the position of the star, thanks to ESA's Gaia mission, and the trajectory of JWST itself. JWST follows an orbit around this region that requires periodic corrections through station-keeping maneuvers," notes Yücel Kilic, a postdoctoral researcher at the IAA-CSIC and.

The broader interest lies in linking the observation to climatic, geophysical or environmental dynamics that extend well beyond the immediate event or location. Earth science is unusual in that its most important questions operate on timescales that no single research career can observe directly, making the archival record, whether in ice, sediment, rock or satellite data, as important as any new measurement. Results that can be embedded in that record, and that either confirm or challenge the patterns it reveals, carry disproportionate scientific weight.

At the time of the occultation, Chariklo was moving relative to JWST at just 2.5 kilometers per second (1.6 miles per second). The Institute of Astrophysics of Andalusia (IAA-CSIC) led all phases of the study, from the project's scientific design and the prediction of the occultation by Chariklo observed.

Because this item comes through Phys. org Space as science journalism, it should be treated as contextual reporting rather than primary evidence. Good science reporting can identify why a result matters, connect it to the wider literature and make technical work readable, but the decisive evidence remains in the original paper, dataset, mission release or technical record. That distinction is especially important when a story is later repeated by aggregators, because repetition increases visibility, not evidential strength.

The next step is to place the result inside longer time series and to compare it with independent instruments and independent sites. Earth system observations gain most of their interpretive power from network density and temporal depth, not from any single measurement however precise. Model simulations that assimilate the new data will help clarify whether the observation fits comfortably within known natural variability or represents a shift that existing models do not reproduce.

Source