A Solar System in the making? Two planets spotted forming in disc around young star

Observed two planets forming in the disc around a young star named WISPIT 2. Having previously detected one planet, the team have now employed European Southern Observatory telescopes to confirm the presence of another. The institutional report frames the development in practical terms and ties it to the broader mission or observing effort.

The significance lies in astronomy does not advance on single detections. The field builds confidence by accumulating independent observations across different wavelengths, instruments and epochs until isolated signals become defensible conclusions. What looks convincing in one dataset can dissolve when a second instrument looks at the same target, and what looks marginal can solidify when follow-up campaigns confirm the original reading. The current standard requires that a result survive this triangulation before the community treats it as settled. WISPIT 2 is the best look into our own past that we have to date,” says Chloe Lawlor, PhD student at the University of Galway, Ireland, and lead author of the study published. The system is only the second known, after PDS 70, where two planets have been directly observed in the process of forming around their host star.

Unlike PDS 70, however, WISPIT 2 has a very extended planet-forming disc with distinctive gaps and rings. The first newborn planet found in the system, named WISPIT 2b, was detected last year, with a mass almost five times that of Jupiter and orbiting the central star at around 60.

After an additional object was identified near the star, measurements made with ESO’s Very Large Telescope (VLT) and the VLT Interferometer (VLTI) confirmed its planetary. The new planet, WISPIT 2c, is four times closer to the central star and is twice as massive as WISPIT 2b.

To confirm the existence of WISPIT 2c the team employed the SPHERE instrument on ESO's VLT, which captured an image of the object. The team are eager to make follow-up observations, with Ginski noting that “ with ESO’s upcoming Extremely Large Telescope, we may be able to directly image such a planet.

What gives the story weight is not just the object itself, but the way the measurement trims the range of plausible physical explanations. Astronomy has accumulated enough cases to know that the most interesting results are rarely the ones that confirm expectations cleanly; they are the ones that confirm some expectations while complicating others, or that open a parameter space that previous instruments could not reach. The scientific community evaluates these contributions by asking whether the new data constrain a model in a way that older data could not, and whether those constraints survive systematic review.

+498930000-3295 Email: bourdarot@mpe. mpg. de Bárbara Ferreira ESO Media Manager Garching bei München. +49 89 3200 6670 Cell: +49 151 241 664 00 Email: press@eso. org We use cookies that are essential for accessing our websites and using our services.

Because the account originates with ESO Press Releases, it functions best as a primary institutional report that is close to the data and operations, not as independent scientific validation. Institutional communications are produced by organizations with legitimate interests in presenting their work in a favorable light, which does not make them unreliable but does make them partial. Details that complicate the narrative, including instrument limitations, unexpected failures and results below projections, tend to be minimized relative to progress messages. Technical documentation and peer-reviewed publications, where they exist, provide the complementary layer that institutional releases cannot substitute.

The next step is to see whether other instruments and other wavelengths tell the same story. Campaigns with JWST, the VLT, the forthcoming Extremely Large Telescopes and radio arrays will provide the spectral coverage and spatial resolution needed to move from detection to physical characterization. The timeline for that kind of confirmation is typically measured in years, not months, which is worth keeping in mind when reading the current result.

Source