Cosmos Week
NASA Watches Earth’s Weight, Finds Center of Mass
Earth scienceEnglish editionInstitutional sourceInstitutional update

NASA Watches Earth’s Weight, Finds Center of Mass

Seasonal changes redistribute enough water around Earth to shift the planet’s center of mass back and forth by fractions of an inch relative to its geometric center.

Original source cited and editorially framed by Cosmos Week. NASA News Releases
Editorial signatureCosmos Week Editorial Desk
Published16 Sep 2026 16: 08 UTC
Updated2026-09-16
Coverage typeInstitutional source
Evidence levelInstitutional update
Read time4 min read
Seasonal changes redistribute enough water around Earth to shift the planet’s center of mass back and forth by fractions of an inch relative to its geometric

Key points

  • Focus: Seasonal changes redistribute enough water around Earth to shift the planet’s center of mass back and forth by fractions of an inch relative to its
  • Detail: Institutional origin: separate announcement from evidence
  • Editorial reading: institutional release, useful as a primary source but not independent validation.
Full story

Seasonal changes redistribute enough water around Earth to shift the planet’s center of mass back and forth by fractions of an inch relative to its geometric center. The institutional report frames the development in practical terms and ties it to the broader mission or observing effort.

The significance lies in Earth science becomes stronger when local observations can be placed inside a broader physical pattern that spans time and geography. The planet operates as a coupled system in which atmospheric, oceanic, cryospheric and solid-Earth processes interact across timescales from days to millions of years. A measurement that captures one variable at one location and one moment has limited interpretive value until it is embedded in the longer series and wider spatial coverage that allow natural variability to be separated from forced change. 5 min read Preparations for Next Moonwalk Simulations Underway (and Underwater) Water sloshing between the land and oceans shifts Earth’s center of mass relative to its geometric. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video NASA’s Space Geodesy Project currently uses a variety of space- and.

NASA develops and supports. Mission: GRACE-FO When did GRACE-FO launch. 305 miles (490 km) above Earth What does GRACE-FO do. GRACE-C GRACE-C will provide month-to-month changes of Earth’s gravity field to track water movement and surface mass changes.

NASA scientists have developed a new technique using ultraprecise satellite tracking to estimate the displacement to within fractions of inches. To reduce uncertainty, JPL geoscientist Donald Argus led the development of a new technique based on ultraprecise satellite tracking.

Using satellites to locate Earth’s center of mass is not a new idea. The new technique improves accuracy in two ways: It adds GPS tracking into the mix along with orbital data from several satellites in low Earth orbit to provide a diverse array of.

The broader interest lies in linking the observation to climatic, geophysical or environmental dynamics that extend well beyond the immediate event or location. Earth science is unusual in that its most important questions operate on timescales that no single research career can observe directly, making the archival record, whether in ice, sediment, rock or satellite data, as important as any new measurement. Results that can be embedded in that record, and that either confirm or challenge the patterns it reveals, carry disproportionate scientific weight.

They found that snow accumulation in North America and Eurasia reaches a maximum in March and shifts Earth’s center of mass about 3 millimeters toward the North Pole. A month later, in April, rainwater in the Amazon River basin peaks at 2, 400 gigatons, swinging Earth’s center of mass 2.2 millimeters toward South America.

Because the account originates with NASA News Releases, it functions best as a primary institutional report that is close to the data and operations, not as independent scientific validation. Institutional communications are produced by organizations with legitimate interests in presenting their work in a favorable light, which does not make them unreliable but does make them partial. Details that complicate the narrative, including instrument limitations, unexpected failures and results below projections, tend to be minimized relative to progress messages. Technical documentation and peer-reviewed publications, where they exist, provide the complementary layer that institutional releases cannot substitute.

The next step is to place the result inside longer time series and to compare it with independent instruments and independent sites. Earth system observations gain most of their interpretive power from network density and temporal depth, not from any single measurement however precise. Model simulations that assimilate the new data will help clarify whether the observation fits comfortably within known natural variability or represents a shift that existing models do not reproduce.

Source