KRONOS II: Solar-like Umbra and Penumbra Properties on the Young Sun V1298~Tau

Transiting exoplanets provide a unique laboratory for studying stellar surface heterogeneities via starspot or facular occultations. The new analysis still awaits peer review, but it already lays out the central claim clearly.

This matters because exoplanet science has moved beyond the era of simple discovery into a period of comparative characterization. With more than five thousand confirmed planets known, the scientifically productive questions now concern atmospheric composition, internal structure, orbital history and the statistical properties of populations rather than the existence of individual worlds. A new detection or spectral measurement is most valuable when it adds a well-constrained data point to those comparative frameworks, not when it stands alone as an anecdote. When observed at multiple wavelengths, this configuration enables spectroscopic characterization of spot thermal contrasts, distributions, and morphology. In this work, we leverage JWST NIRISS/SOSS transit observations of the 20--30 Myr planets V1298 Tau bcd to study the surface properties of their solar analog host star V1298~Tau.

We identify 14 starspot crossing events across two visits. We derive $0.8-2.8μ$m starspot contrast spectra and demonstrate the contrasts can only be explained when accounting for the umbral and penumbral components of the starspots.

The differences between these spot components and the stellar photosphere are consistent with sunspots. Additionally, the relation between the spot contrast and the ratio of umbral to penumbral area is similar to that of the Sun.

Combining these JWST observations with long baseline multi-band photometry from the Las Cumbres Observatory, we also estimated the global unocculted spot distribution, revealing. All together, these measurements suggest that while the total spot coverage evolves in time, the relative temperatures of surface heterogeneities on Sun-like stars may be.

The broader interest lies in making the target less anecdotal and more comparable with the rest of the known planetary population. Population-level questions, such as the frequency of atmospheres around small rocky planets or the prevalence of water-rich worlds in the habitable zone, require well-characterized individual data points before statistical patterns become meaningful. Each new planet with a measured radius, mass and, ideally, atmospheric constraint is a brick in that larger structure, and the accumulation of bricks eventually allows theorists to test formation models against real distributions rather than projections.

Furthermore, these results demonstrate that JWST exoplanet transit observations can be useful for starspot substructure characterization. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy.

Because this is still a preprint, the result should be read with genuine interest and proportionate caution. Peer review is not a guarantee of correctness, but it is a process that forces authors to respond to technical criticism from specialists who have no stake in a particular outcome. Preprints that survive that process, often with substantive revisions, emerge with a stronger evidential base than the version that first appeared. Until that stage is complete, the responsible reading keeps uncertainty explicitly visible rather than treating the claims as established findings.

The next step is to improve independent constraints on the mass, radius, atmospheric composition and orbital dynamics of the target. Transmission spectroscopy with JWST, radial velocity campaigns with high-resolution ground-based spectrographs and phase-curve measurements from space photometry represent the observational toolkit that can move characterization from plausible to robust. That convergence of techniques is the standard the community now expects before a planetary atmosphere result is treated as confirmed. Until peer review and independent follow-up address those open questions, skepticism is not a failure of appreciation for the work; it is part of how science decides what to keep.

Source