Did the Viking 2 lander detect marsquakes in 1976?

New analysis shows that 2 possible marsquakes detected by Viking 2 were in the same region as nearly 1, 000 others detected by the InSight lander decades later. The post Did the Viking 2 lander detect marsquakes in 1976. The science-journalism coverage adds useful context, while the strongest evidential footing still comes from the underlying data, papers or institutional documentation.

That matters because Earth science becomes stronger when local observations can be placed inside a broader physical pattern that spans time and geography. The planet operates as a coupled system in which atmospheric, oceanic, cryospheric and solid-Earth processes interact across timescales from days to millions of years. A measurement that captures one variable at one location and one moment has limited interpretive value until it is embedded in the longer series and wider spatial coverage that allow natural variability to be separated from forced change. Decades later, NASA’s InSight lander detected nearly 1, 000 marsquakes, some of them in the same region as the Viking 2 events. NASA’s Viking 2 lander detected two possible marsquakes back in 1976.

From 2018 to 2022, NASA’s InSight lander detected nearly 1, 000 marsquakes. Some of them were from the same region as the 1976 Viking 2 detections.

Marsquakes in the same place decades apart The Viking 2 lander, 4th spacecraft from Earth ever to land on Mars, touched down on September 3, 1976. But by comparing the data from the two missions, scientists have gained new clues to the seismic history of Mars.

Comparing the data Viking 2’s landing site in Utopia Planitia, and InSight’s landing site in Elysium Planitia, are both in Mars’ northern lowlands. Xiao and his team compared the data from the old Viking 2 mission to the more recent data from InSight.

The broader interest lies in linking the observation to climatic, geophysical or environmental dynamics that extend well beyond the immediate event or location. Earth science is unusual in that its most important questions operate on timescales that no single research career can observe directly, making the archival record, whether in ice, sediment, rock or satellite data, as important as any new measurement. Results that can be embedded in that record, and that either confirm or challenge the patterns it reveals, carry disproportionate scientific weight.

As they mentioned in the paper: Fifty years after Viking 2 returned the first seismic observations from Mars, we reconstruct its unique seismic workflow and reassess the most. Marsquakes offer clues to seismic history on Mars The sol 80 event in particular provides more clues to the history of seismic activity on Mars.

Because this item comes through EarthSky as science journalism, it should be treated as contextual reporting rather than primary evidence. Good science reporting can identify why a result matters, connect it to the wider literature and make technical work readable, but the decisive evidence remains in the original paper, dataset, mission release or technical record. That distinction is especially important when a story is later repeated by aggregators, because repetition increases visibility, not evidential strength.

The next step is to place the result inside longer time series and to compare it with independent instruments and independent sites. Earth system observations gain most of their interpretive power from network density and temporal depth, not from any single measurement however precise. Model simulations that assimilate the new data will help clarify whether the observation fits comfortably within known natural variability or represents a shift that existing models do not reproduce.

Source