Dark energy flips its sign, but the Hubble tension refuses to budge
For nearly a century, astronomers have known that the universe is expanding. In the late 1990s, two independent teams, the Supernova Cosmology Project, led by Saul Perlmutter, and.
Key points
- Focus: For nearly a century, astronomers have known that the universe is expanding
- Detail: Science reporting: verify primary technical documentation
- Editorial reading: science reporting; whenever possible, verify the cited primary source.
For nearly a century, astronomers have known that the universe is expanding. In the late 1990s, two independent teams, the Supernova Cosmology Project, led by Saul Perlmutter, and the High-Z Supernova Search Team, led by Brian Schmidt and. The science-journalism coverage adds useful context, while the strongest evidential footing still comes from the underlying data, papers or institutional documentation.
The significance lies in cosmology operates at the edge of what current instruments can measure, where systematic errors and model assumptions are never trivial. Small discrepancies between independent measurements have historically pointed toward missing physics rather than simple calibration errors, and the ongoing tension in the Hubble constant is a live example of how a persistent disagreement between methods can reshape the theoretical landscape. Each new dataset that approaches this territory with independent systematics adds real information to a problem that has resisted easy resolution for more than a decade. In the late 1990s, two independent teams, the Supernova Cosmology Project, led by Saul Perlmutter, and the High-Z Supernova Search Team, led by Brian Schmidt and Adam Riess. Combined with cold dark matter, this gives us the LCDM model, the standard picture of the cosmos for the past 25 years.
It fits observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB), i. e, the leftover glow from the Big Bang, as well as maps of galaxy clustering and the brightness of exploding. The Hubble constant, H 0, describes how fast the universe is expanding today.
This mismatch has fueled a decade of proposed fixes, from new particles to modified gravity. Earlier studies have reported that this single change can ease both the Hubble tension and a related mismatch called the S 8 tension, without hurting the model's success at.
Our concern isn't with the physics of LsCDM itself, but with how cosmologists typically measure "tension" between datasets in the first place. To test this, we combined the latest CMB data (from the Planck satellite, the Atacama Cosmology Telescope and the South Pole Telescope), the newest galaxy-clustering measurements.
The relevance goes beyond one dataset because even small shifts in measured parameters can matter when the field is testing the limits of the standard cosmological model. The Lambda-CDM framework describes the observable universe with remarkable economy, but its success rests on two components, dark matter and dark energy, whose physical nature remains entirely unknown. Any credible measurement that tightens or loosens the constraints on those components moves the entire theoretical enterprise forward, regardless of whether the immediate result looks dramatic on its own terms.
Discover the latest in science, tech, and space with over 100, 000 subscribers who rely on Phys. org for daily insights. Yes, the sign-flipping model does shift predictions in the right direction, toward the locally measured expansion rate, but the observed H 0 still lies in a surprisingly unlikely.
Because this item comes through Phys. org Physics as science journalism, it should be treated as contextual reporting rather than primary evidence. Good science reporting can identify why a result matters, connect it to the wider literature and make technical work readable, but the decisive evidence remains in the original paper, dataset, mission release or technical record. That distinction is especially important when a story is later repeated by aggregators, because repetition increases visibility, not evidential strength.
The next step is to see whether the effect survives when independent surveys, different calibration strategies and tighter control of systematic uncertainties enter the picture. Programmes such as Euclid, DESI and the Rubin Observatory will deliver datasets over the next several years that cover the same parameter space with largely independent methods. If the current signal persists through those tests, its theoretical implications will become impossible to set aside.

Original source: Phys. org Physics